But if you are an African American artist making a 'black' horror film, your cliche palette is doubly restricted. There is no in-between for a black character in Hollywood, usually. They are either devout churchgoing disciplined members of the community or pool hall pimps. You need both, you know, to prove you're not racist. So for every rainbow-feathered pimp Blacula bites, you need a monologue about brothers being kept down by the man; for every jive-talking voodoo priest, a noble cop fighting white corruption in Harlem, for every pusher, a guy handing out outreach pamphlets. It's got to be freaky, but brother, it's got to be cognizant of its social message, scary in a 'boo' kind of way, but not so much the other kind of boo, which is some kind of outmoded racial slur, I think, though if a black lady calls you that, it's friendly, like 'dear' or 'dude.' Or so we think. Damn dude, you could lose your mind.
February is Black History Month, which means on all the news channels the 'message' flows, very occasionally, albeit diluted by 'safe' social commentary (i.e. George Washington Carver rather than Angela Davis; Dr. King rather than Malcolm X), which helps at least posit the problem of getting beyond the vibrant stereotype vs. anemic progressive dichotomy. Can the black experience be represented in a risky, artistic, dangerous, even abstracted manner, or must 'intelligent' blackness be rendered only through dull, dignified bourgeois blandness?
African American playwright/actor Bill Gunn was given money to make a black horror film after AIP's BLACULA (1972) proved a surprise hit, especially among black audiences. But BLACULA was directed by a white man, so producers figured if they got a brother to make a vampire movie, for cheaper, they'd rake it in double.
But instead of a blacker Blacula Gunn made a nouvelle vague semi-experimental horror love story that was a choppy, fragmented mess, haphazardly framed, with terrible sound mixing. If you sunk some of your white boy $$ into it you might be pretty pissed, but if you stuck with it, without judgment, it gradually crept up and delivered something brand new and unique, beyond any duality of white or black filmmaking. Once you surrendered to it, the effect was startling, new, unforgettable...
Not least of its assets are the title characters: the rich, isolated doctor Hess (Duane Jones) and Ganja (Marlene Clark), a very unusual type of strong black woman who manages to assert herself without rustling feathers or being bitchy or unsexy, or moralistic, or judgmental. They are antithetical and ambivalent as in the best tragic figures of Shakespeare, with the guts to admit they don't really care if other people die. They are characters dealing with blackness, as opposed to being representations of blackness, which are then toned down or played up to fit pre-fabricated molds (see my 2007 analysis of this via Cabin in the Sky, here).
I love Nick Pinkerton's description:
Hired to crank out a Blacula knock-off (with a drug-joke title), Gunn instead wrote a surreal love triangle among black sophisticates, devoid of sex-machine phoniness, and directed it in a muttered, disorienting style, with a strange brew of Afro-Euro symbolism. Duane Jones is Dr. Hess, a gentleman scholar studying a pre-Christian African blood cult; Stop's gorgeous, sloe-eyed Marlene Clark is Ganja, as lively and droll as Hess is lethargic. Gunn himself plays the turbulent artist who infects the doctor. He had a genius for writing monologues, and delivers them with absorbing intensity, especially in his character's schizo suicide dream of playing both murderer and victim, showing Gunn's fascination with the divided self.When seeking a way to wrap your narrative-expectations around Gunn's "muttered, disorienting style," it helps to have a bit of a grasp of black cinema history. The films, for example, of African American pioneer filmmaker Oscar Micheux were notoriously mismatched and fragmented, as if the audience was handed a stack of coupons, leaflets, half-finished letters, and chapbooks and told to read through them at random and let the complete novel form in their brains. For sure, there's that feeling with Gunn's film too; you feel the final touches were never added. Seemingly disconnected scenes (are whole pages of exposition and explanation in GANJA missing?) come together in your mind as you watch it, creating a delayed sink pull drag effect, as if by the time you figure out that something's chasing after you, it's too late to escape. Soon you're dead... but... why, are you still there? Was death waiting for you to catch up to it, or has it already moved on?
George Romero showed brave social put-your-money-where-your-mouth-is casting by having Jones in the lead of NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD (1968) and it's perhaps no coincidence that Jones plays the lead in GANJA AND HESS. Like his character in DEAD, Jones' Hess is an intelligent black man with no time or interest in proving it, or hiding it or being subservient for white acceptance. We see Hess's intellectual strength, fatherly tenderness and icy reserve, for example, when he visits his son at boarding school, and the pair have conversation in fluent French, a reminder of the way so many black artists expatriated to Paris in order to escape racism. Even so he remains closed-off, aloof, abstracted, not a bad father or a good one, how a genuine intellect would be--eccentric and aloof, even to himself. And that may not sound like much, until you realize every black dad in movies is either a strong, tough but good dad like Larry Fishburne in BOYZ IN THE HOOD or a drug-dealing thug like Samuel Jackson in MENACE II SOCIETY. Jones is neither, he is not playing 'a dad' -rather he is a man with a son.
Examples of the racism a character like Hess would have to endure were all over the papers when GANJA AND HESS opened, and when it was selected to represent America in the 1973 Cannes Critic's week. Gunn wrote the following letter (excerpted) to the NY Times on May 13, 1973 (following the tepid reviews of his film, including outright admissions by critics of walking out):
"If I were white, I would probably be called "fresh and different." If I were European, "Ganja and Hess" might be that little film you must see." Because I am black, I do not even deserve the pride that one American feels for another when he discovers that a fellow countryman's film has been selected as the only American film to be shown during "Critic's Week" at the Cannes Film Festival, May, 1973. Not one white critic from any of the major American newspapers even mentioned it."Indeed one wonders, would this film be recognized if it were released for the first time even today? Probably not. Now that our culture has grown further distracted by CGI and MTV whiplash editing, it would be impossible for teenagers to stick with the disorienting jaggedness long enough for the hypnotic effect to kick in. I confess I spent the first ten minutes kind of puttering the living room, keeping an eye on the image to see if the shot ever changed, but not really tuned in. It might actually have been beneficial to do that, as my unconscious was tuning in while I was distracted. But would I have lasted that long if I was a film critic seeing this in a screening room on a busy day of deadlines?
On the other hand, Gunn is right: if the film was French, these Times critics would have pissed all over themselves trying to 'discover' it first. I often wonder what Godard movies would be like in France, without subtitles, as subtitles fit so well his post-structural imagery, and so much of his dialogue overlaps or is mixed low making full comprehension impossible without them. Gunn's film basically answers my question, and the answer is yes. If GANJA had subtitles and everyone spoke French throughout (instead of only in the boarding school sequence), it would have become a new wave classic.
To appreciate this film you have to let go of having everything spelled out, you have to trust that your unconscious understands the background whispering, the disjointed meanings, even as you scratch your head and think about doing the dishes. Stick with it, and your unconscious will reward you.
The main thing that kept me rooted to the film was the incredible electronically-warped soundtrack: African chants and spirit calls echo throughout the film like an ancient tribe stumbled upon a flanger and a feedback amp and managed to send their chants forward through time. In Gunn's world, the distant past and the future are both relatively unfixed: the past can roar up to grab you and the future is already biting you and draining your blood so it can survive into another day. Gunn uses a growing feedback squall to indicate when our vampire hero starts to jones for a sanguinary hit, making us aware of the link between vampirism and heroin addiction, or alcohol, the way a person who's been waiting for 4PM cocktail hour since he woke up will snap the head off anyone who suggests, at 3:30, they go see a movie instead.
The droning demand for blood and the ghostly presence of African drum on the soundtrack make the ethereal score an audio-mimetic equivalent of the ghosts that haunt Brutus Jones in Eugene O'Neill's play,The Emperor Jones. An early suicide in the film is set to music that gradually echoes into abstract noise as the camera circles around the self-inflicted carnage, creating a dizzying POV sense of a soul suddenly freed of its body, no ears to translate the dissonant sound waves into music.
Is this surreal echoing booming what a tree sounds like if it falls in the woods and there's no one around to hear it? I got a panic attack when a similar effect was done on the song "I can't live (If living is without you)" in Roger Avery's RULES OF ATTRACTION. Watching this scene it was like that panic attack finally blow its own brains out, like a rose from the tip of the crown chakra had been plucked. More than any other 'vampire' film, 'black' film, or even 'white' film, GANJA AND HESS dares to examine sound and vision that lie past the point where there are eyes and ears left to see and hear them. It re-imagines the Bluebeard legend as a chance for forgiveness and admission of true and refreshing ambivalence about life.
What's missing in the film is a serious line of continuity, and that's where Gunn relies on cliche, as we "know" the missing scenes (such as continuity and establishing shots). Clearly, a mix of budget constraints and artistic control necessitated some of these choices, but they work because they force us to fill in the blanks, like watching a foreign language film without subtitles forces us to notice mise en scene in an abstract composition sense. And then, when Ganja shows up, she's so warmly human and yet so strong that the film kicks into gear; we've been straining to get past Hess's alienating persona, so we're sensitized and ready for her sensual assault. I wont spoil it, but about halfway through the film she delivers a long, tearful monologue, lit only by firelight, and the subsequent eruption of happiness and music is one of the most powerful cinematic moments I've had in awhile, and the long single take monologue in dark lighting is what helps catapult it. In short, Gunn uses his limitations for powerful effect, mixing the agonizing real-time emotional build-ups with ecstatic release: all the strain pays off.
Looking at this marvelous, truly unique film as a whole, it makes a fine mirror parable to problems discussed at the start of this essay: How can a black artist be true to himself, relevant to the pop cultural landscape, and supportive of his black ancestry all at the same time. And should a black artist be continually burdened with conveying the 'entire' black experience, or indeed any of it? Gunn also addressed this in his response to criticism in the Times:
"Another critic wrote - where is the race problem? If he looks closely, he will find it in his own review."
This innate 'extra' requirement for black art is like a lead albatross affixed to every struggling black author or artist, and a problems faced by Hess in the film: knowing the only thing that can hurt him is the shadow of a cross over his heart, he decides to get born again down at the local church. Sometimes, merely climbing out of a swimming pool can be a true baptism, just like sometimes raggedy scraps of black film can come together as galvanizing art, and sometimes that art can be recognized, even if it's made by a black man in America and ignored by white critics in his own country, even if the black man is expressing himself rather than the all-consuming thirst of blackness.
(Special thanks to poet/performance artist Tracie Morris for turning me onto this film and informing sections of this review, and The Temple of Schlock.')