Showing posts with label Canada. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Canada. Show all posts

Friday, November 25, 2016

The Primal Scenesters: TWIN PEAKS

(NOTE: CONTAINS SEASON 1, 2 SPOILERS)

Thanksgiving has come and gone, other holidays are beginning to roll around; everyone with parents and grandparents to visit begin the backwards slide into composites of past versions of themselves, to not alarm their elders who remember them a certain way and the one chance for differing political views to find themselves handcuffed to tradition and turkey like a seasonal DEFIANT ONES. Self-righteous drunk sophomore English majors try to show racist uncles BLACK MIRROR, season two episode 3 ("The Waldo Moment") and uncles snidely flip to football cuz they claim they can't understand British accents.

After enough booze is drunk, and it's late, things get better, as if sensing a lull in the hostility, wives and aunts start nagging to go home or yelling down the stairs that it's time to go to bed just when you and your racist uncle or communist nephew are just starting to feel the buzz of familial love you've been drinking towards all night.

Hang all those reproachful female glowers,! Clink your ice and toast each other's burning health.

TWIN PEAKS has found an even better route to this union of opposites: the common bond of mystical forestry. Take only footprint casts and leave only pictures, polaroids hidden barely under autumn leaves right there on the forest floor... don't tell me of what the pictures are of, though, let Cooper look on my behalf, for his eyes are trained for horror, and peruses the back issues of Flesh World with the dispassionate eyes of a doctor.


On this we can agree: money buys booze which buys at least numbness, and before the morrow's dry mouthed pain, fluid ecstasy. And it's in the valley between those two states of mind that TWIN PEAKS does its misty mountain creeping. Especially once one folds in FIRE WALK WITH ME, because-- for all your family's flaws--unless they've sexually abused or otherwise warped you, they're good parents. If you're formed into an adult with a somewhat concrete sense of reality vs. fantasy then they did a decent job and deserve a break. If not, what right did they have spreading their Usher-esque inherited madness onwards into the future like a plague?

Of course there's no way for YOU to know if you are a single cohesive whole with a grasp on collective reality --you're too close to yourself. Only when you meditate, or trip really hard or get a massive fever, may you see just how easily your perception of self and reality can shrink to nothing but a pinpoint, or widen to the universal with each breath. And, alas, back again.

When you come back to normal from the madness of that serious acid trip, or your fever breaks, or your meds are adjusted, then you feel like a rebooted hard drive, and what programs open and how the drive structures itself --its basic startup OS--that's the parental gift. If you come back into a feeling of well-adjusted parameters of self, a good moderate balance between emotional extremes, then you owe your parents or caregivers big time because from age 1-5 they paid attention and partitioned your hard drive right, made you feel adored and then forced you kicking and screaming if needed, to go to kindergarten and to endure what seems like dozens of painful booster shots, then let the doctor give you a lollipop.

Like LSD or pneumonia, Twin Peaks bumps the neurochemistry of a 'normal' Pacific Northwestern small town so that the usually subconscious demons and darkness can come bobbing up to the surface like a ship's hull in stormy seas. Incest--that of Laura Palmer by her possessed father Leland--structures the core of the warping reality of Twin Peaks, the way that of Jack and Danny or/and presumably Jack and his father (not necessarily in physical reality) structures The Shining. 


Is that lil Jack in the costume, and his dad?
My theories here expand on those of Roger Ager in his Shining analysis, a genuinely disturbing interpretation in the vein of ROOM 237 but far darker and more inescapable, a kind of mad mixture of Oedipal detective deconstruction and blood-chilling fate-amplifier feedback. As with the best theorists (as opposed to the dry 'respectable' ones), Ager doesn't give a shit if he sounds like a crackpot--it's not like we can do anything to help Danny, or Laura for that matter --they're fictional characters. He knows this. He never succumbs to 'think of the children!' hysteria.

Instead he just warps back around with perfect logic until creepy paranoia sets itself up in the reader organically. Ager's theory is all the ghost stuff is cover memories and excuses for this most odious of abuses, covered by Shelly Duvall's denial. While I agree to a point, he begins to lose me when insisting these ghosts can't be both real and figments of a warped cover memory. Basic physics proves adequately to even the laymen that the perception of matter as solid is a hallucination, as is the perception that we are not on a giant rotating orb whizzing inexorably through space and time.

Perhaps--as in the 'stone tape theory--trauma releases an energy beyond our three dimensions that then leaves a permanent imprint; like some stray outlines of images from a deleted movie on a hard drive, outlines that show up superimposed on parts of the next film to be downloaded, just waiting for the right (disturbed) laser beam to come along and decode them into a solid form and 'see' that form into a kind of sub-existence.

UNTIMELY RIPPED:

The disturbing implication of course is that we're all somebody's bad dream cover memory. Be the part of the dream that helps the dreamer, that's the Cooper/Buddhist way, joyful participation in the sorrow of the sexy 50s universe pleasant dream that oscillates regularly into nightmare and back again. THE SHINING, on the other hand, is almost swallowed whole by that dream's devouring demon maw. There's no Cooper there, no cops (aside from emergency radio monitors who are powerless to intervene once the radio is smashed), nothing to help keep the one source of sane goodness--Shelly Duvall--from total breakdown. There's no sexual desire anywhere in the film, no connection whatever between husband and wife --the only expressions of love are between mother and son, and father and son in a weird terrifyingly 'off' way (the only way Danny can even voice his concern is by asking "Dad, do you feel bad?" The only desire in the film is for alcohol, and other venues of escape (including murder), things which--relatively speaking--help the dreamer either wake from the dream or else go deeper --into total unconsciousness / the past (where Jack apparently finds peace).

The common conspiracy theories about the reptilian sexual predator Illuminati CIA Monarch 7 programmers in our midst (see: Make up your Mind Control) tend towards young women, but other branches of the theory say members use their own children in sacrificial ceremonies and sex magick rites, not necessarily just for some kind of perverse pedophile enjoyment, but to intentionally create split personalities they can then use to their own ends (as assassin amnesiacs, etc.) and to create a massive amount of negative energy which sixth generational reptilian overlords love to drink, and/or use to enter our plane.

Consider the implication in a lot of these stories (THE INNOCENTS and THE HAUNTING in particular) that deep cover memory repression of dark events provides the current that activates the dark ghost 'residual energy' captured in the walls, so that traumatic moments in the past keep repeating. That energy stays there, up for grabs to anyone with the right wireless router to tap into. And who has that router? Free-floating demonic spirits--formless and powerless usually, like inactive ions or dried-up flies in the corners and basement doorways--the trauma recorded in the stone provides the energy jolt back into corporeal existence (on some higher or lower frequency from the spectrum of most human's perception). Be the energy coming from the trauma of past dark crimes or--in the case of poltergeists--boys or girls hitting puberty.  The huge amount of psychic disturbance shocks the inert magnetic anomaly some choose to call Satan into our dimensional spectrum.

In other words, incest or similarly abominable crimes are like a wave generator that gets the boat of consciousness bobbing, allowing the usually unseen barnacles on the lower hull to rise above sea level. Thus the unseen barnacles whisper to sleeping seamen above them through the wood, bidding them to obscenely vile doings.

This is why we need our dad to protect us from demons, why we long to sleep in our parents' bed. Monsters are afraid to come bother us there, this is a fact in our minds - UNLESS the incest is real and the parents are the monsters --then the child has no one to run to. That's so horribly unfair and cruel it's too horrible even for horror films (except in the abstract, as past events) and may explain the bad vibes and press accorded Fire Walk With Me. Nearly every living human agrees pedophiles are monsters and we have no wish to see their despicable acts. Is the refusal to film or see these things what makes us human? We know such things exist - as we hear about their 'rings' being busted up - but most of us, I trust, wouldn't have the first notion how to find them or slightest urge to want to. If I didn't believe that, how would I be able to look my fellow humans in the eye on a day-to-day basis? They exist, these people, but out of sight.

And the craziest part, is that the incest doesn't even need to be 'real' to have this dehumanizing effect. The primal scene witnessed at the right age and blocked from consciousness, existing only as a dark projected reflection in the water of the child's subconscious, creates a weird pre-school jolt of anal phase sexuality creates the nucleus hollow jouissance core around which will be spun the tennis ball threads of healthy adult sexuality. Covered up as it is with lime green felt, the hollow core is still there, giving the ball its bounce, even if usually it's never even seen.

With 'real' pedophiles (who were usually, almost always, molested themselves as children), the outer felt never forms. the threads hang loose, and there is no core, or core is all there is.

The cocoon of reason brings death's head moths.

And surrealism, of course. The primal scene and repressed infantile sexuality are the interior decorators of the subconscious. And if the filmmaker is a good surrealist--like Bunuel or Lynch--they decorate the mise-en-scene with seemingly incongruous details that point to truths too deep and subconscious to approach directly. As with dreams they are the mirror to the Medusa; gazing directly at the primal horror of our own primal birth, the gaudy horrors of the human reproductive life cycle, will drive even anyone mad. The whole process, from erection to umbilical snip, is like some bloody, gooey scene from ALIEN until--ideally--that tennis ball felt forms around it, a felt of birth announcement postcards, cure hand-knitted booties, and wedding veils. The flesh wraps like a forgiving curtain over an autopsy.

It is happening... again
The lurid-hollow core underneath the felt is supposed to be in the subconscious, a bad dream, interpreted as in the sidpa bardo by entwined lovers as fires in the cold empty darkness. If you get too close and you get stuck on the flypaper womb and are reborn into the world of time and space and sorrow and joy. As a child you are far closer to your previous life than adulthood. Unable to process where you are, or resist the giant hands constantly picking you up and putting you down, you are trapped in a narrow window of time, the past curtained off, the future totally out of your hands --all you can do is either cry or suckle; soon that is all you know--life and death polarities as simple as the nipple (rubber or human) vs. the yawning abyss of powerlessness and sleep void of dreaming as there's nothing yet to repress or remember.

This is only part of why the first glimmers of sexual desire in young children tend to be focused onto their parents, who--as most do--merely accept these fleeting crushes as passing stages, using them to perhaps encourage them to clean their room, but they must never reciprocate or indulge or even encourage such a crush. Otherwise the young, developing brain warps like a plant growing in on itself or a feedback squall. Dissonant and destructive reality itself becomes like a dream, a time and space-melt occurs, the usually progressive phases jam up on each other like a bunch of kids piling up like a highway pile-up halfway down a twisty water slide. Multiple selves spring up to accommodate; the singular slide becomes a hydra, each head branches away in opposite polarities (one self is a wanton harlot, the other a virgin, etc.)

Usually a kind of yin-yang dividing line between the adult conscious mind (structuring 3-D space/time reality and correct decoding of social signifiers), and the unconscious mind (dreams, fantasies, hallucinations, mythic correlation; the ability to become immersed in a book or movie narrative) becomes a complicated post-war map where boundaries are susceptible to constant invasion far beyond our usual 'waking up into or out of a dream' while either falling asleep at your desk in class, or having a lucid flash in a bad dream and trying to wake up out of it in the dead of night by clicking your ruby slippers together like Dorothy trapped in reform school after drowning Mrs. Gulch (yet there she still is, every night, in the mirror- the mouthful of toothpaste water spat at her does but melt her for a moment)

Consider the WIZARD in this context: if Dorothy was molested, say by her aunt and uncle while growing up, then the wicked witch would be unstoppable. The Wizard would have Dorothy's face beaming back at her instead of his own; and all the scarecrows and lions would be left to their own devices while she hid forever in the poppy fields, and later killed the tin man, emptied out his armor and hid inside it when the Emerald City PD rolled through.

The first thing she'd do when back in Kansas is become a tornado chaser, then later when that didn't work, move to Kansas City to become an opium addict prostitute who--when she looks in the mirror--sees the dead wicked witch of the east looking back. Gotcha, you wicked old witch, the witch says to her, my little pretty - now it's hydrophobic Dorothy running from the sweet young witch and her rubby slipper fetish.

It's fate, baby. If you can't even look in your own backyard without a tinge of terror and shame, then you'll be very distressed to know there's no place like home because even at home you are still, as they say, no place.

Thats why Lynch is such a genius and why we can see through the bullshit tropes of the other Twin Peaks writers--the ones from season two who turned it into a kind if Cheers set in a Pacific NW police station (i.e. the dopey romance between Andy and Lucy); and why--even if you were a TWIN PEAKS fan in 1991--you too were horrified by the 'cop-out' answer to who killed Laura Palmer in 1992, because it brought in the supernatural in such a way as to almost seem like cheating (the 'it was all a dream' twist that leaves any respecting horror fan feeling disgruntled).

THE HACKS DESCEND

There were other annoying things, all involving the fame of the show itself, for a craze had sprung up in the weeks before the season one ending cliffhanger, and thus the show now had the burden of becoming of a whole summer of expectation and speculation. By the time the Bookhouse boys were raiding One-Eyed Jacks and dealing with Michael Parks rocking the worst French-Canadian accent in the history of  TV, we realized it had become the show our parents were remembering--like if someone wanted to make a movie about Dali's melting clocks, so they cast a normal American family called "the Clockers" living in a tropical environment without AC and having the usual adventures (teacher's nights, PTA snacks gone wrong, starting a small bakery) while slowly melting from the heat.

In other words, what Seattle feared would happen, happened: I know, I was part of it. Moved there with my then-girlfriend after college, summer of 1989, left for good the following spring 1990. TWIN PEAKS was riding up in my rearview as I drove across country like a boomerang. Starbucks too, was in my backdraft (indeed, one can see how thoroughly Twin Peaks influenced Starbuck's then-nascent dark wood / low yellow light chain aesthetic when one realizes that when the show first came out, Starbucks was strictly a few 'stands' set up at various Seattle malls and locations around the Pike Place Fish Market, etc. - in other words, it's success marks it as the first and most enduring sign of how thoroughly the show influenced the dark look of 90s America). Nirvana was still a few months away. There was no time to even change into your rattiest flannel shirt before flannel shirts were fashionable and then you couldn't wear them anymore.

I'll confess, I loved it all. I felt like all the things I loved about the Pacific NW had come back east with me, like some kind of virus care package.

SILENCE OF THE LAMBS came out around the same time as season two -- you could feel the TWIN PEAKS air in its veins--and took the whole moody small town serial killer leaving enigmatic clues thing to a whole other level. Naturally the sudden season 2 appearance of Wyndham Earle seemed a rather hamfisted move to keep up with the Lecter craze (the super genius serial killer leaving strange clues thing). Dumb shit like the one-eyed crazy wife Nadine thinking she's back in high school and exhibiting superhuman strength after an amnesia conk; the dewy, pleading, over-acted puppy-eyed David Schwimmer-esque agoraphobe with the special diary; James--the bland leather jacketed, dumb-as-a-post pretty boy with the dyed-black hair--embroiled in a femme fatale's rich husband killing scheme like goddamned John Garfield after riding his bike away to mourn yet another murder of his girlfriend; the love affair and pregnancy between the dangerously incompetent buffoon cop Andy and the baby-voice nitwit receptionist Lucy at the sheriff's office; Josie Packard's old Hong Kong pimp flying in to raise hell over a perceived double cross (that part was OK, but underdeveloped); Ghostwood Estates, Joan Chen, Peggy Lipton's ex-con husband the poor man's Patrick Swayze glum soap opera mid-age hunk type; idiot James blaming himself for everything that goes wrong... When Lynch isn't at the helm of an episode, the traumatic disruption of the primal scene isn't there, the underlying dread of a real, dark, reality-altering secret isn't there to vivify the symbology, the tennis ball has no bounce; the clocks do not melt.

Instead, dead husbands are now alive for no real reason; the furor surrounding a noted anonymous travel writer / food critic A.M. Wendt (what a chortle to be had over all the painfully trite mistaken identities!) seemed like some middle-aged hack who'd been banging out scripts since the Lucy Show might think is "that Twin Peaks kinda kooky," like "that Barton Fink feeling," the sort they glean from a cheat sheet faxed over by their agent.

As the series petered out there were still spots of brilliance: Lynch's appearance as Cooper's boss at the FBI came with his incomparable homage to the Weenie King in THE PALM BEACH STORY ("you have a nice clear voice like a bell!"); Wyndham Earle evoking the great Brember Willis in two James Whale movies--as the kindly woodland hermit in BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN and crazy cackling Saul Femm in Whale's 1932 OLD DARK HOUSE--in his befriending and torture of still-alive Leo--who eventually (after being sadistically tortured enough by Earle that our need for vengeance is satisfied) becomes sympathetic. The great David Warner himself importing genuine menace, class and surprise as Josie Packard's old pimp, surprising everyone by re-bonding with Dan O'Herlihy, the man he tried to kill,  still alive; after all; David Duchovny as the cross-dressing FBI buddy of Cooper's (their easy by-play exhibiting truly wondrous Hawksian male professionalism)

But there were other less inspired things: Earle's elaborate games with the pretty girls of the show--their naive excitement over a "Miss Twin Peaks" contest (I think they'd had a real-life 'Girls of TWIN PEAKS' group Vanity Fair cover by that point) deadens their collective mystique the way our love for Nick Drake deadens when we hear first hear "Pink Moon" in a car commercial.

When Lynch directs an episode you can tell right off as the surreal touches stack up like an eclipse of uncanny frisson; when other hands take the controls, we just get the 'sequel' - the 2010 to Kubricks' 2001.


I'm not blaming anyone in particular. If anything it's the public that are to be blamed, myself included.  The whole TWIN PEAKS craze had broke out in full over the summer before the second season started-we were TWIN PEAKS obsessed but there were only seven episodes and now we had a long wait for more. Like JR before, we had to know who killed Laura Palmer. All that summer you could feel the pressure they were under to not lose track of whatever they felt had led to the success, even though it was maybe never intended to emphasize those elements.

A long-time practitioner of transcendental meditation, Lynch surely knew the damaging effect that kind of acclaim can have. Lynch has an ego like a polite and gifted child who sings sweetly and musically and keeps quiet when asked because it knows it's not in charge--its part of a soul's democracy with higher and darker forces of yin and yang. But pity the man with no self-distance or humility in a similar circumstance, who lets the acclaim he's receiving puff out his ego so it just never shuts up, shrill and incessant and laughing at its own jokes. A strutting marionette rather than a worthy king, old Ego hears the praise and it just puffs him further out until the unconscious anima voices that won him the acclaim are drowned out and hackwork carpetbaggers move in, the same baggy-suited shills who've been slowly killing suddenly popular TV shows since the 50s.

I know Lynch wasn't the only creative force involved with the show, but Mark Frost never really registers except as an all-around TV series guy--harnessing Lynch's surrealist imagery and use of music to a series-ready narrative chapter structure (normally a weakness with Lynch, who often has to backtrack out of narrative and replacing divots, filling holes and dead ends with Moebius loop tape and dissociative character dissolution). We could feel Lynch's unholy touch when he took control and directed episodes--they're infinitely more intriguing, darker, stranger, than the rest, more resonant with tiny observed detail as opposed to gaudy momentum. In this difference we can learn much, which is why I stress it below... here... now:

What's immediately apparent is the difference between true surrealism (reflecting the primal scene and subconscious' incestuous dread--which again doesn't have to have actually ever happened--to 'exist' on some level in the collective subconscious) and 'bein' quirky' - i.e. surrealism lite, the kind you can show to grandma. Whereas in Kubrick and Lynch (and Bunuel), the incongruous elements point towards dark subconscious desires which are neither there nor not there, in the hack episodes the elements point only to older sitcom and soap plots, arduous contrivances to lead to some slapstick buffoonery (Andy with his foot in an umbrella stand at the snooty wine tasting - Bwa Bwa!). The writers and directors on these episodes are like the dad who crashes his son's game of war and decides he can shoot around corners and and never has to die because he can make bullets become dandelions before they hit him. Half the kids leave as soon as they realize he's not playing by the rules, but the son is trapped and then--so proud of himself--the dad later boasts he's such a good parent for 'entering his son's imaginary world.'

But in trying too hard to be 'different' in that by-then mass-marketed Twin Peaks-style, these lesser episodes only accentuate how bad formulaic weirdness is vs. what's at the deep deep core of true weirdness, which is something no sane parent wants any part of and hence is always present below the levels of actual perception or existence (like radio static).... the primal scene. As inescapable and under the surface, as immediate and foregone an eventuality as sudden cannibalism. We don't lunge at our children and devour them at dinner, and we don't molest them -- it's a no brainer -- on such things society is formed, and the titans like Cronus are banished to the depths of the Earth for doing both and so the sun finally comes out. Whether or not the Illuminati demand corruption of the innocent for their magicks or if it's just the collective subconscious burbling up through the cracks of regressive post-suggestion hypnosis I for one cannot say, but I can say, this being the age of "After Freud," that it doesn't necessarily matter. If the primal scene / repressed libidinal picture of Satan worshipping child molester gathering in robes with candles to commit ritual violation didn't exist it would by very virtue of its taboo status be dreamt about anyway and seen by paranoid schizophrenics and visionaries as all too-real.

The next time you look in a mirror and wince or see yourself in your parents features, remember that they too see themselves in you and that's not always a blast for them, either. Bad parents never instill that revulsion because they never create the right conditions for it. They spoil you rotten one week and ignore you the next, so that you live and die by their smile even after you're old enough to move out. Remember how you screamed and cried when mom first dropped you off at school, feeling as if she stuck the knife in and twisted, sending you off to your death instead of kindergarten? You'd have been so happy if mom relented, if she heeded your cries and took you home.

But if she did, where would you be now?

You'd be happy for a few more hours but then fucked forever. More often than not, thank heavens, mom knows this and her innate maternal instinct is tempered by the juicy thought of being free from your neediness for a few golden hours. Just as we must stop sleeping in our parent's bed, and we must go out and play with other children, mom must shoo us from the room. If not done soon enough, Norman Bates is the result.

 So what happens if, instead of Norman Bates, we have the Laura Palmer? What if instead of enduring this trauma during the Elektra complex phase of a girl's life, she actually does take the mothers' place in the primal bed? It's an infantile wish the young girl doesn't even understand the implications of, and she shouldn't have to, the frustrations of not being able to supplant her mom fade as the thwarted energy builds to knock her into the next stage of development. If the dad comes to her when she's deep asleep while still in this phase, it might not even register as more than a disturbing dream just way more vivid than most. Even if he's a typical good dad, the dream might still be there, but coded, vivid enough that a hypnotist with an agenda can coax it into reality and maybe it will even be 'remembered' as real if the hypnotist digs deeper than the actual reality and unearths the subconscious instead, like she's trying to excavate the back yard to put in a pool but accidentally cuts into a water pipe or deep reservoir of repressed libidinal sewage. It's a simple mistake but the result destroys the father's life and ruins the backyard forever.

No family is innocent of incest if the subconscious is taken as real. The result if it is is an inversion, the conscious--the social life, school, normal boyfriends, family dinners--are made dream-like, nightmarish. If she's pretty and charming the subject's dreamlike disconnect can enrapture and confuse a whole community. When she dies it's like a triple reverse axle of depth of field --her body is marooned in the river of the real, a decomposing home to crabs and muddy water, and yet her mystique is even more assured. Her profound effect on the community increases to the point of mythic heroism; she lives on now in the collective subconscious like the princess anima for the entire town. She's the madonna of their personal nativity, the siren of their collective ocean, and the demon whore of their private nightmare delirium tremens.

SCHRODINGER'S CAT-SCAN

If we can't remember back to our own childhood conception of sex, the weird miasma of magic and misunderstanding by which we imagined our coming out of our mother but carrying our father's features, we're maybe lucky. I envisioned a soundwave-based process wherein my mothers' "stomach" received a radio signal from my father's brain.

It's perhaps the duty of parents to put up with the child's constant curiosity about these big issues, their being drawn to the sound of the primal scene going on upstairs, the Oedipal 'mom is being hurt; thing.' If we learn the truth too early, let it be from other kids so it comes masked in plausible deniability. I remember being told about by kids who'd seen X-rated magazines in the parents bedrooms, and calling them liars. Hearing it from other kids first we get a grace period for it all to settle in the brain as fiction prior to fact (we're grossed out --that's where we pee from!), so the monstrosity of these acts can slowly fade under the safe buffer of possible fiction. Hearing it from our parents we can't deny it. We're like a middle-aged smoker waiting for the results of his first chest cat-scan. Sure, smoking killed our relatives, but as long as the doctor's cat scan hasn't come, we can bluff our cough and grey pallor in the mirror. While waiting for the X-ray results or the Cat-Scan, we're ashen with genuine fear. This is the Schrodinger's Cat-scan paradox.
---



All fans of horror must deal with the feeling Freud doesn't mention, but Lacan does, that the primal scene also carries a current of jealousy and if prolonged over time ("Bob's been coming to me at night since I was seven") the cover memories become part of the maturing identity ("Laura was like two different people"), which could never grow if stunted by the traumatic realization that this bestial act is how in fact we came to be. If it comes too soon upon the heels of our birth, the very same horror that created us now destroys us, like Lot's wife turning around to look at the explosion too close to the blast radius, only instead of becoming a pillar of salt we're merely bereft of any sense of security or safety, with no idea of what is a dream and what is reality because we don't trust the person who should be waking us up when we're screaming. That's why Lynch is such a rare great filmmaker for he can tap into that zone. There's no need to distinguish a dream from reality for Lynch, there is no difference in importance between the two, because meditation and vision have given him the strength to not flinch from the blinding light and scalding sunshine. He can hear colors and see sounds! At the very least, he's found the ultimate 'door in the floor' to his own subconscious mind. Therein be monsters that can come up to grab you (Bob to Leland; Leland to Laura) like a maniac from the backseat suddenly grabbing the wheel while you're going 80 on the highway.


It's in Lynch that this dark incestuous table cloth flip comes to life via surrealist touches--collective cover memories woven together from 50s teenager pop culture-- worlds darker and farther beyond most dime-store freak-show nonsense.

Today you can see the myriad half-assed attempts at being shocking that confuse vivid torture porn and kinky abductions and brutal serial killer artists with that kind of edge --or worse, don't bother to mine the actual Freud below the brutality, but take the surreal touches as their own reality, leaving a diluted sense of prefab emptiness, like expecting an oven to arrive but instead getting a meat thermometer and a pie recipe. Lynch's edge is so deeply etched that the surface can be portrayed as a very tranquil stream with just a tiny eddy in the current, the music from Angelo Badalamenti just as layered -- the pretty emotional sweep atop, the lower ominous bass drone below. Rather than get an oven, Lynch turns the heat up in your house to broil and sticks the thermometer in your ear.

If the incestuous reverse primal scene happens for real it's like a fish riding a dark 'devouring father' pederast Cronus bicycle through the mirror, splintering the budding superego reflection into a thousand persona splinters; the fish may as well be plastic and mounted on the wall, and occasionally turning to face the camera and singing "Take me to the River." We spent thousands on marketing and mass audiences really responded to that song, while showing women subjected to brutal rapes is okay for the church, a female orgasm is demonic. Behind me right now is playing a film on Syfy, a Predator rips the spine out of a dude, but the dude literally can't even say 'shit'!  The most basic and obvious taboos are so far afield they're blind to them - but Lynch isn't. That's the surrealist difference and you can sense it even with your eyes closed, maybe even especially.

HOPE FOR THE FUTURE: Audrey Horne

Audrey used to be favorite crush, but that was 25 years ago. I have changed, gone from her approx. age to old enough to be her father. Seeing the show now, Audrey seems impossibly young and superficially coy; cherry stem knot or no, she's out of her depth at One-Eyed Jacks. Still, we admire her for going, as we admire Cooper's fortitude in rebuffing her sexual advances without disrespecting or humiliating her; he changes an explosive situation into a positive growth experience. We also note with relief the healthy disregard and wary respect her capitalist father, Benjamin Horne, has for her. Rather than see her as a confederate or opposition or burden, Ben is scared of her. He might try to ignore her as much as possible but at her age, isn't that his job? Compared to the incestuous closeness of Leland to Laura, he's a saint. Her freedom from negative paternal influences (Ben and Cooper both) allows for room for Audrey to safely practice the art of feminine manipulation. Working on the manager of Horne's department store (above) to get a job at the perfume counter, the 'gateway to Jacks' comes easy and seems-at first-a walk in the park. But once there, Audrey is subject to a near miss of incest (that would have horrified Ben even more than her, which is why we like him, relative saint that he is.) 

That the situation--part of the season 1 cliffhangers--is resolved, and nothing happens between them (neither discovery, nor incest) is a pointer towards how daddy-daughter relations can have respect and tension without all the physical closeness craved so unrealistically, even frenziedly, by say Natalie Wood in REBEL WITHOUT A CAUSE. If a daughter still wants to climb all over her dad's lap by the time she's 17, something is wrong. She should hate him, or think he's square. And he should encourage that freedom from himself. This is the natural order. Ben has his own peccadilloes to worry about - Audrey comes and goes as she pleases. Her mom is a clueless depressive, her brother mentally handicapped --both are seldom onscreen. Audrey may feel unsupervised but with the run of the hotel (and its secret passage system) she's unusually protected and empowered. It's only when stepping outside its walls--into the red velvet womb lining of One-Eyed Jacks--that she becomes endangered. We admire her because her motivations are noble --her desire to help Dale more than just desire to earn his gratitude, but a recognition of his goodness, the sort of goodness that allows her to practice bad girl behavior under a roof of relative benign paternal safety - making her the opposite of Laura, who played at good girl sainthood under the roof of sordid incestuous uncertainty.



Note above the masks echoing the Illuminati masquerade party in Eyes Wide Shut. If you know you're conspiracy theory you know the whole one eye shut signifier is Illuminati code, pointing to the Eye of Horus (as in the top of the dollar bill pyramid - watch it next time you're tripping and see if you can catch it winking --magic's everywhere, bro).


Of all the younger characters, Audrey us the closest to Cooper in her mixture of poetic depth and genuine altruism. With her weird scene ending jukebox dances at the diner she indicates she doesn't need drugs or sleazy drug dealing pimp types to be really high, to keep a foot in the fantasmatic.

Ben Horne makes the universal Illuminati sign, "The Eye of Horus."
Lack and the world laughs at You:
Cocaine and the Fantasmatic

Alternately, Laura Palmer died after she degraded herself with the two nastiest characters in the series--Leo, and the fat, gross drug dealing bartender slob Paul Renault, purveyor of the sick sex and drug parties given in the cabin in the woods. Conspiracy theorist will point out the compulsion towards degradation in Monarch-victims and incest survivors, but one can't forget too the all-consuming jones that comes with regular use of bad drugs like cocaine and heroin. I've seen impossibly gorgeous models go home with sleazy townie-toothed dirt bags for coke. It's quite shocking and upsetting. I'm too cheap, and decent, and high-class, to not be horrified. A noble Cooper/Audrey type, I am! But hey, if you have a lot of cocaine, and bring some to a model party, but leave the rest at home, you can score with girls normally way outside your league. All you have to do is have enough, have far more than you personally use, and be patient enough to nurse their jones into full on addiction and then you cut off the supply--but make it clear (but on the DL) you have plenty but aren't passing it out anymore, and are now leaving to go home-- and see who asks for a ride. You didn't hear it from me. I'd never stoop so low myself. But I've been to those parties sober, and seen the externals of that whole process, and even drunk off my ass, was horrified. 


Lynch wisely makes no attempt to capture the realness of that scene--the sordid externals of the druggie backwoods lifestyle--but rather conveys a mix of what it's like to actually be that super high on 'tactile' drugs like cocaine and ecstasy and what an outsider straight-edge like Lynch-- who by all accounts doesn't do drugs--might imagine with a mix of envy and horror. 

Not doing them or having wild orgies himself (by all accounts), allows Lynch to invest these scenes with his subconscious fantasy, what Todd McGowan (in his book The Impossible David Lynch) calls the fantasmatic level (rather than the tawdry sadness of, say, a cocaine rehab). According to McGowan, Lynch's films occur on two levels at once, the fantasy conscious idealized small town social constructs (picket fences, log trucks, diners, poodle skirts) and the fantasmatic (dark red or blue velvet on the walls, kinky sex, drugs, road houses, slow dancing), each a reflection of the other - made extreme by the other's extreme (the sunnier the upperworld, the murkier the lower). Cooper is a variation of Kyle's Jeffrey in Blue Velvet, an Orpheus descending from the Upper into the Underworld to find lost souls (Palmer's body like the ear in the field), just as Bob ascends from the fantasmatic dimension to the real, i.e. One-Eyed Jacks and the cabin in the nebulous stretch of woods between Canada and the USA on the 49th Parallel, i.e. Canada  ("border towns bring out the worst in people" as Charles Heston says in Touch of Evil).

DESCENT INTO THE FANTASMATIC
The most amazing and least talked of aspect of the show is the way dreams and mystical visions
are never doubted as evidence or valuable clues, not even by Mel Ferrer's FBI coroner
Agents: Cooper goes deep--to the Black Lodge--from his position in the above,
a representative of the US and the FBI, a paladin essentially from heaven;
Bob - goes up, from his position as a representative of the Dancing Dwarf. essentially from Hell
with Bob, for all his fierceness, imprisoned and subject to some lower order dictated even to the Dwarf
ex-gang members: One shot Cyrus; one stabbed Bernardo
---
EPITAPH-EDRINE

I mention all this to posit gratitude for parents born, dead, even indifferent, because if you're not a split personality coke whore schizo at your soul death's door it's not for your lack of trying, it's for their time and investment. They may have done dumb things, or ignored you or fought or burdened you with their problems, but if your primal scene crypto-Elektra complexes were grown out of-- relegated to the subconscious basement of childhood--then you're lucky, because so much work and energy and care has to go right for you to come out normal --at least six or seven years of solid attention, the right brand of attention, and then the ability to lessen that attention and--if necessary--to boot you out the nest, hoping you fly but willing to let you crash to the forest floor.


And as for the series itself, Season two especially warns us of the danger of moving too far afield from primal scene anxieties and the other subconscious elements (the misconstruing of what constitutes sex, the mysteries of one's own conception and inheritance of one's father's features) and instead reflecting already reflected signifiers, the sort found in nearly every small town soap drama: food critics, conspiracy, jailbird husband stalkers, cross-eyed imbecile cops, every male wearing the same terrible curly haired black toupee, amnesia, hospital pillow snuffing, femme fatales seducing cross-eyed pretty boys into offing their husbands, shady gambling dens and brothels, disguises, seductions, identical cousins investigating a murder from a different town, beauty contests and other lame attempts to become everything it thinks you think the show already is, rather than what you're afraid of dreaming.

If in doubt, consider the slasher movie, still loping around dying drive-ins prior to Twin Peaks' 1990 debut, vs. the game-changing (and Twin Peaks-reflecting) Silence of the Lambs in 1991. Suddenly there were countless dark Vancouver-shot psycho mood pieces. These indirectly led to the X-Files. Badalamenti's memorable music led to loungecore and trip-hop, led to Lana del Rey. And the Black Lodge.... is still there, alive in Salvia culture and Ancient Aliens, and the dusky Pacific NW old growth romance vibe is in Twilight, and the dark wood and yellow lighting aesthetic of Starbucks (which moved east from Seattle in conjunction with the show's success). And you were there, Tiny Dancer, Tim Scarecrow. And your crutches and sobriety fell like glitter from a Wigstock head trip makeover, down, down into the abyss of the materiality second wind, the rich co-opting our fabulousness to sell each other art and perfume, couture...

Maybe too it was the disturbing second murder episode halfway through season two where we see in vivid detail a terrifying dual performance from both Ray Wise as Leland and Frank Silva as Bob - each one more terrifying than the last. Ray Wise especially is genuinely blood chilling as his compassion and sadness at what's happening intensifies to higher and higher degrees until the madness of a howling rabid dog.

Critics fawn over Dennis Hopper in BLUE VELVET (1986), a precursor of Lynch's that led to TWIN PEAKS, but on revisiting both, Ray Wise as Leland blows Dennis Hopper out of the water; for that matter so does Dana Ashbrook as Bobby (left), because his eyes show real madness, just as Lynch's visions are mad, vs. the way people between the lines and inside the box think of as mad, in terms of the surface, i.e. put a giant waiter talking in cryptic code up in there or have a shrink with 3D sunglasses and an obsession with Hawaii, hey far out, the fake mad vs. the real mad.

Instead of relying on familiar tropes, Lynch goes deep into the moment. You never know where another is going to land --blood on the donuts, squeaky chairs. Now that I, too, am insane, I can smell the real deal vs. the trying to be crazy version, and for all his coiled angst, and Dennis Hopper's sobriety gets in the way of his Frank. He's an angry, strung-out man pounding cracks in a wall like De Niro did as RAGING BULL (1980) - but he doesn't break through any wall. The crazy exhibited in the work of Dana Ashbrook and Ray Wise on the other hand is truly wall-eroding.   Wise's layered madness in season two is marred only by his insistence on singing, which might be the writers' idea, but I always suspect actors of asking directors to let them have a scene where they can sing once it's clear the series is going to either be renewed for a third season or canceled; they do it a lot in actor indulgent TV shows like later seasons of most anything when the original creators begin to run out of ideas.

I remember this image from the local Seattle paper when I lived there, needless to say they were very dismissive -- how dare a non-Pacific NW native attempt to depict their lifestyle and love of gourmet coffee?
In its terrifying over the top way, this second murder is up there with the greats, like the last act in the original Texas Chainsaw, or the type that needs no markers of quality or realism but gets to the true terrifying core - offset by the Suspiria cherry reds and deep ocean blues of the Roadhouse stage where Julee Cruise plays regularly, all the would-be rescuers hypnotized by the emotion of the music and with no direction or guidance except the giant, noting "it is happening again," while we're powerless to know where or whom.

Alas - while Fire Walk with Me and the second season second murder both reverberate with a pulsing surreal horror, there are still some 12 episodes or so remaining after that in which to kill time after the killer is caught. Cooper's almost out the door, back to Washington, and in walks a DEA Fed and a Mountie, railroading Cooper on behalf of Jean Renault who's angry about his dead brother Jacques. Not so fast! 

You can hear the entire nation groan in the feeling they're being taken for a ride. Or rather, the weight heaving on the trolley as the few million viewers still left all got off in one collective outraged howl.

If that wasn't bad enough, forth cometh the quirks, the soapy nonsense, the frills and the meandering

If The Shining didn't have any murders, what would it be?
A tree falling in the woods?
Would you answer it?
Even if it was her... hot and damaged Del Rey that was the tree and she was falling...
falling....
in love?

And she was out of meds? And it was the rainy season?



Zooey Deschanel was ten when her mom was shooting Twins (as
Donna's momand you can kind of tell.
Trip to the Lounge, Swim to the woods.
TWIN PEAKS to DEL REY 
Post-Histaural Chronologic Signifer Map


Friday, May 07, 2010

Lords of Fliestown (Cute Kids and Canadian Corpses): THE CHILDREN, SURVIVING CROOKED LAKE, PLAIN DIRTY

  THE CHILDREN
(2009) Dir. Tom Shankland
***

British horror auteur Tom Shankland closes in on Neal Marshall for the title of British John Carpenter with this sweet tale of a tadpole egg-related infectious disease that turns children into coughing, smiling, wan, matricidal maniacs in an isolated English estate on Xmas holiday. 
 
What's really good here--aside from the awesome music--is the film's knowing critique of our fucked up social order in the wake of 1980s conservative "Spielbergism," through which 'cute' children are allowed to literally get away with murder while sulky teens are ostracized for beginning to remind parents too much of themselves. As an eldest child attention-seeker who's had to face being upstaged by cuter little tykes (and with no children of my own), I relish scenes where blind adherence to child-worship  results in bloody death. The seminal archetypal moment in this is perhaps the daughter in the basement rising up to grab a trowel in 1968's NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD (right). Advancing towards her mom while all mom can do is plead, so crippled by maternal compassion she can't even ward off a single stabbing blow. 

If that's one of your favorite scenes in movies, then you will love THE CHILDREN, wherein moms conveniently forget that their sweet children were trying to stab them just minutes ago, preferring to blame the savvy teenage girl in the group, rather than be forced to re-adjust their sense of the cuteness hierarchy. It's a terrifying thing when your parents won't believe you for no other reason than your little sister is more angelic and less openly rebellious, so you wind up punished for her murders. Shankland creates a great sense of mood, pace and real time amidst the dead winter English countryside, and it's heartening that in Britain you can still show parents drinking and smoking in front of their kids, as they did in my day. I'm sure there's American audience members who think that if you smoke and drink in front of your child you should be arrested for reckless endangerment, and I'd just love to stick these sanctimonious reactionaries in this movie, so they could cry "Won't someone think of the children?!" as they gently wipe their own blood off said children's mouths and knife edges. Oh yeah. Believe it, for the jealous older sibling in each of us, These CHILDREN got mad corn.


SURVIVING CROOKED LAKE
(2009) - Starring Stephanie Richardson
*1/2

Or "Anti-Antigone" as this Canadian film (made by three University of Toronto film students) starts off ready for riveting with the story of girls learning to shake the veneer of civilization to survive in the wilderness, but instead it winds up being about a girl's irrational refusal to bury the decomposing corpse of her brother. You don't need a hostile Greek king to pronounce her sentence, she'll do it herself --that's feminism! Rather than fight bears, tigers or hillbilly mutant cannibal rapists,  Steph (Stephannie Richardson) and her three cute blonde friends have to contend with Steph's obsessively self-righteous "no corpse left behind" policy. 

Up until about half-way through the film it's a pretty good bucolic fantasia. Our three student directors keep the shots artsy and the shorts short, with sun-dappled dreamy close-up dissolves from one blonde-haired, nearly-mature beauty to the next. There's a nice film school idyll at work, like the cinematographer really studied PICNIC AT HANGING ROCK (1973) and maybe even MEAN CREEK (2005). But then the film bogs down into an argument about whether to drag the heavy, rotting corpse of their accidentally dead guide --he is also Steph's dead brother--FITZCARRALDO-style over hill and dale towards what they hope will be the highway. 

As Steph is the insane one who wont bury her brother or leave him, it becomes very hard to not judge her as the villain for her selfish, reckless endangerment of her friends, just so she can save her sibling's rotting corpse from being re-absorbed into nature. When some friendly wolves offer to take the corpse off her hands, Steph shoos them away and you don't know whether the filmmakers want you to cheer her bravery or wish she'd just get eaten, too. In other words, are these filmmakers weirdos who think archaic funeral rites make us human or are they recovering from some past trauma of being forced to attend an open casket funeral as a child? 

Either way, like, ick. 

Whereas THE CHILDREN seems a veiled critique of modern over-parenting and child worship, SURVIVING CROOKED LAKE becomes an open attack on girls who can't let go of their "inability to let go," even with slow death by starvation (anorexia) and constant vomiting from the stench of a decomposing brother (bulimia) staring them in the face. Are Canadians obsessed with dragging corpses around or did the screenwriter get flummoxed at the first narrative hurtle? Is this a national problem the way child obsession is in the states and UK? Something that needs to be addressed? It's certainly far enough outside my own realm of experience it seems made for some weird necrophiliacs-trying-to-get-straight rehab lounge. I hope it's not that someone somewhere secretly gets off on seeing girls regularly vomit from the stench of what was days ago their mutual object of teenage lust! Praise Jesus and King Edward, it ain't me babe.

 PS - If you want to check out another quiet strange "personal" Canadian exploitation film along the lines of CROOKED LAKE, may I recommend instead PUNCH?  Allegedly about the world of female topless boxing, it's actually the story of a widower trying to ween his daughter off her incestuous desires for him so she'll stop socking his new girlfriend, a timid photo booth worker with a topless boxing sister who may just have to come to the rescue. The director's actual daughter plays the girl and admits in the essential commentary track that the story is based on their true relationship!! In other words, he got funding to make a sleazy late night Cinemax cat fight flick but highjacked it to tell his own perverse confession, ala Ed Wood with GLEN OR GLENDA! Icky but fascinating... read my review here. 

 
 PLAIN DIRTY 
(2003) Dir. Zev Berman
***1/2

And if you want a good swampy jail-bait exploitation fairy tale that's way off the radar and which the writer/director subverted to his own motive--this time to a loose reading of MACBETH--check out the under-appreciated PLAIN DIRTY (2003, above). It's almost Val Lewton-esque in that it shows you can make art instead of obsessive confessions and still hide it all under a functionally exploitative backwoods sleaze rubric. It does what HOUNDOG could have, though from the box art you may be tempted to pass this one off as one of the endless Zalman King-style infidelity and revenge sex flicks cluttering the late night premium cable rosters. But this is good stuff, actually, something fans of Jane Campion’s THE PIANO will like better than IN THE CUT. 

Newcomer director Zev Berman and newcomer screenwriter Deborah Pryor have conjured up a mystical swamp environment that augments what amounts to nothing less than a genuine psychosexual feminist fairy tale, the type where the frog suitor of the imprisoned princess shows no signs of ever being a prince, but if she looks at her chains the right way they sparkle like jewels and a beautiful castle lies hidden in the dirt and squalor of her prison. Dominique Swain stars as Inez MacBeth (yeah, there’s Shakespeare connotations), the desirable young bride of local loser Edgar (Henry Thomas, aka little Elliot fromE.T.) whose friend the creepy Flowers (Arie Verveen) is infatuated with her, even stealing her flip flops for god knows what kinky purpose. Karen Allen is great as the “witch” who lives in a big house down the way, who predicts Inez’s true love will soon ride to her rescue. Inez assumes she means her pale, rich boy in town (James Urbaniak) who looks vaguely like a marionette just waiting for someone with the raw humanity of Inez to turn him into a human. What follows involves murder, desire, suspicion and double-crossing, but what makes it succeed is all that groovy archetypal mythic resonance, ala the female’s journey to adulthood, which one hardly finds in films these days. There’s lots of that good old southern fried gothic po’ poetical dialogue, and symbolic metaphors like blindness, chains, and headless chickens. 

Thankfully, visionary directors and writers like Berman and Pryor are finally starting to realize these low budget sex pot indies can be used as more than just wastes of drunken late night cable viewers’ time. They take a typical swamp and cut off shorts exploitation set up ala Gator Bait, Poor White Trash, or Mudhoney, and then go off the deep end with it, into Kentucky-Freud Gothic grandeur. There’s a great, scraping viola and cello score by Nathan Barr, and dark, steamy cinematography by Scott Keven, both of whom worked, along with Verveen, on that last great entry in the redneck genre, Cabin Fever (2002). Keven doesn’t waste any chance to capture muted swampy sunlight trying to break through the filthy windows of these muddy shacks. The performances are all wonderful, especially Verveen’s, who manages to be believable while being simultaneously dirty, poetic, sneaky, charming, and oh so creepy as he woos Inez with lines like: “I wanna see what you look like when you grow old. Is you gonna grow gray or what?” Swain’s untamed Lolita-like energy makes her a believable force of girl nature, running around in her cut off shorts (nowhere near as short as Daisy Duke’s, alas) and cut up, dirty legs, or a filthy summer frock.

The big bow should probably go to Thomas though, as Edgar he manages to give one of the best abusive husband performances ever. His rage is shocking to himself, and deluded attempts to try and forgive or justify his own actions come off as false even to him, driving him further into a spiral of rage and self-hatred projected in all directions. Sexy, brutal, funny, well-paced, well written, and turned into something truly mythic and magical thanks to a great writing, moody score and cinematography, Plain Dirty is one of the reasons why taking risks on the straight to video shelves sometimes pays off.

---
MMMmmmm, filthy... isn't there some over-nurturing movie parent out there who can come do her laundry?

Friday, May 15, 2009

SCANNERS amongst us


Someone tried to scan me today at a graduation party, so I thought back to that Cronenberg film from 1981 that looks like it's set in 1972. Then I found this review I wrote, from 2007. Coincidence?

Cronenberg cast Patrick McGoohan in SCANNERS as the Professor of mind melting, whose languid drawl makes one trust him implicitly. He slides around the room on the tranquil force of his measured speech. The wars of the world and word with Cronenberg are fought between corporations, and this back in the seventies, before the world was destroyed!  While snowy desolation roars outside the corporate HQ, inside the cozy offices, people nap on reception area couches. It's Canada, where the laws are looser, the drugs are better, peoples' minds are still rooted in the world of sideburns, medallions, turtlenecks and deep mellifluous actorly voices.

In America everyone's getting all uptight over who's gonna get that last line on the mirror. In Canada they're egoless, locked in lysergic staring contests that go on for years, and the styles of the 1970s settle in like bears for the 80's winter. But all the coziness does not come from home, it comes from the laboratory. Where America goes to the nightclub to hear Richard Belzer, the people of SCANNERS live at their corporation like hospital interns (Cronenberg's medical experience again) until they psychically meld into their jobs. Flesh and nervous systems become corporate walls and crude early versions of the internet. Back in the day before digital plasma screens, Cronenberg already suspects that blood flows through LAN cables.

Cronenberg keeps the exploding heads and gunfire and bursting blood vessels and injections and so forth occurring regularly enough that the parts where people are cordial to one another become oases, cozy little nooks. In keeping us constantly in dread over the vulnerabilities of the body, we become warm and cheerful when we see said bodies snug in sweaters and toasty in their drinks; our own telemorphically-connected bodies sigh in gratitude. Cronenberg’s films are humbling, the dread creates a sense of bodily awareness and if you're not in pain, you feel pleasure to be there.

Cronenberg's violence--however--guarantees you're staying awake. No outcome is certain except MACBETH-style mass slaughter. Mankind's bloody evolution is ultimately unstoppable and the pulpy, lurid grand schemes of the shadowy corporations are ultimately just another form of evolution, as if the fish had to be duped into growing legs and sucker-punched into breathing air. They are forced first, then they learn to like it, then they're addicted. Air junkies. The other fish won't even let them come home -- they're suspicious, they make air a schedule one narcotic. Now there's rows of experimental subjects gasping on the shore, their gills not quite yet lungs, while bearded scientist coelacanths read charts and mutate appendages. Long live die neu fish fleische!

Similar to the way a horoscope seems to directly address one’s situation, emotions, moods, Cronenberg’s scientists always meet their experiments at the personal level. Cronenberg would be an ideal president as he's all too aware of how no one can escape changing forever once they engage minds or bodies with another person, whether just reading their blog or going all the way and linking their bloodstreams via mutated worm-like stomach orifices. A president to remain pure has to live in a bubble and communicate only with through a voice descrambler. Even then the diseases of the corporations infiltrate and warp his mind, each letter of text packed with subliminal counter-meanings.

Without Cronenberg's clinical detachment, the operation would never succeed. Medically trained in real life, Cronenberg betrays a deeply felt ambivalence towards death; it's very Canadian after all, to make peace with the inevitable, it's called... I don't know... growing up? Achieving enlightenment? Or just seeing one too many dead bodies in med school? Any way you choose, America needs to learn how to do this. We still take every death as if a punch to the gut and every birth like the second coming. Dudes, it's a cycle, quit clogging the tube and let the old ladies die with dignity!

America shouldn't be blamed on a personal level for its faults either, though, and Canada via Cronenberg understands the importance of America's need for grandstanding and violent outbursts of self-righteous clownery. Once America’s dream was to be left alone to do its thing; but everyone needed our help to lick Hitler, so we got ourselves all tough and cop-like; after the second world war we were suddenly up in everybody’s grille all the time, trying to get all the nations rested and quiet so we can go back to the sleep of 1900s. Looking for an end to the noise so it can sleep again, that's America. Only everyone else knows the truth: There ain't no noise, America's punching the mirror like Travis Bickle on a meth jag. 

We're too close to see it, but we have this Ned Flanders-ish neighbor who does, and from the safety of his own back yard it's downright hilarious. Would he have it any other way? Hell, he needs our insanity to keep him from going mad with cabin fever. While we continually fuck shit up old Canada quietly looks on, shakes its head bemusedly, and gets back to shoveling out the driveway. A true Canadian, Cronenberg uses us as his model in an art class where the project is bloody medical exhibition pretzels, as if trying to pass some nightmare show and tell. A+!

Sunday, July 27, 2008

The Rote High School Persecution of Saint Ellen


There's something definitely original about the scattershot editing collage techniques of THE TRACEY FRAGMENTS (2007), getting a belated US DVD release after a year in Canada and the broken film festival scene. Director Bruce MacDonald delves unashamedly into the trick bags of JULIEN DONKEY BOY and MY OWN PRIVATE IDAHO, with every little fragment unreservedly depicting sext teen mental illness, teen girl in danger angst, familial breakdown with a father always one step from physical abuse and all that other groovy stuff that's been done before a dozen times... but not this way!

The divine Ellen Page looks here like she's trying to be a mix of Bree from Klute and DeWayne from the homeless kids documentary, STREETWISE (1984). We constantly cut back to a long monologue Page makes to the camera, wrapped in her shower curtain on the bus -all in dreadfully sincere and morose cutter girl poetry prose. The whole film has the feeling of a collage and poetry chapbook one's weird friend might show you, the sort where their sick unconscious screams in your face from behind the morose drawings and symbolism: "I need to see a therapist." But one can't ever get these girls to listen to therapists, they're too downy and cuddled up in their madness.

And if our cutter girl lash-blasting heroines are forced to see a shrink by parents or a judge, said shrinks are all one-note passive-aggressive imbeciles, as is the one here (a passive-aggressive old transvestite).

The problem is TRACEY FRAGMENTS can't let go of the "abused child" cliche lexicon long enough to dwell on Tracey's perverse desire for her own illness. A much more brave and fearless breakdown can be seen in the indie horror film JOSHUA (2007), where Vera Farmiga fondly paints red boots on herself with her own blood. You don't see that sick joy in Page's performance because she's too like a young Jane Fonda, too sincere to see the true glory and godliness that lies in insincerity, the layers revealed when you pull back from your own position. Fonda couldn't pull back, but it was okay because she blazed so insanely upon her own position that layers were revealed in the sheer wattage; she made humorlessness sexy in THEY SHOOT HORSES DON'T THEY, and she made her KLUTE prostitute painfully open. Fonda was like that friend who uses their brilliance in the service of self-limiting rationalization. Page hasn't quite made the grade; she basks in indie blankness and it works because her face is so flawless and empty, in fact her face and Fonda's are a lot alike, almost too smooth, doll-like and yet ferociously intelligent to be sexy at all despite being agonizingly pretty. They both seem underage and too old at the same time, all the time, no matter what role or age they actually are in real life, be it 17 or 56.

But the editing is really the star and in its way this film is the anorexic poetess chapbook version of MAN WITH A MOVIE CAMERA. The dialogue and monologues are terrible though - the dreams of academics slumming in the teenage squalor, jotting down ideas for wrong decisions they never had or made. Tracey's narration (her last name is Berkowitz, like the serial killer!) includes lines like: '"Tracey Berkowitz... Tracey Zero-itz... Tracey Forty Below-itz...", and then there's the cover version of Patti Smith's "Horses," wherein the singer imitates every inflection from Smith's recording to a montage of Tracey running and split screened in with real horses-- and a laughing black man in a bowler hat on the bus to signify alienation and urban hostility, TAXI DRIVER-style.. and a cracked-out dude who hangs on her all skeevy-like named Lance from Toronto. And the colored girls sing "Doo de doo de doo..."


FRAGMENTS is one of those films where the chips are stacked so much against the heroine that you suspect the contest is rigged; if we're supposed to see all this social persecution as Tracy's own twisted fantasy, then don't keep rubbing it in our faces like we're supposed to have these insane AND JUSTICE FOR ALL/CUCKOO'S NEST knee-jerks about the man keeping us down. It's unfair to ask for it both ways, and our director and writer and actress can't see the humor in the fantasizing about high school tauntings ("No tits" is the student's cry, which doesn't seem quite realistic). We see her led by a creepy crackhead who promises to find her brother, and when he gets in a barfight instead of fleeing while she has the chance she waves her agape mouth and horrified eyes around like she's waiting for the director's signal on when to exeunt, and the director's gone to the bathroom. There's some nice shots of a crane machine in the bar though, for all the crane machine fans out there!

You can tell this is directed by the Canuck who did HIGHWAY 61, because it's got the same outdated dress sense (Her heart's desire dresses like he's Desperately Seeking Susan) and aimless mood-building. There's a zero point progression of story here, which is the sort of thing that happens when a director spends the first thirty minutes working to rivet your attention, then runs out of idea and hopes you'll just coast along revisiting the same footage from different perspectives.

I usually try not to write long negative diatribes here, but Page deserves better than all the idle wankery she's been enduring since HARD CANDY, films made by geeky privileged film people who have no experience of the tawdry lives they long to depict. Just as JUNO-scribe Seniorita Diablo Cody slums her way through a year as a stripper and expects the world to applaud, the hyper-stylization at play here masks a very tragic inability to connect with the material beyond the mundane open mic night surface. We only get cliches of stupid parents, abusive sleazeballs, gibbering black folks, none of the frothy depth you see today from maestros who've actually clocked time with the skate set: Spike Jonez, Guz Van Sant and Larry Clark, for example. We see Tracey being persecuted in high school and it feels as if director Bruce MacDonald has--rather than felt the sting of it himself--merely seen too many high school persecution films. Tracey passes through the gauntlet of tampon-hurling cheerleaders that's been persecuting heroines of teen movies right up from CARRIE through Ringwald and Ryder and Lohan. It doesn't seem 'right' - there's no build-up or attempt to understand the 'other.'


Maureen Medved wrote the script based on her novel, and it's perhaps not totally her fault the film is as messed up as it is, but like JUNO, it leaves a weird taste of some Amateur Mendicant Society newsletter. Medved's an academic (assistant professor at British Columbia University, with a long string of plays and publications) which--in and of itself--speaks to a lack of familiarity with the nitty gritty of street life, a lack masked by a theoretical indignation that's near fascistic in its anti-fascist oomph. I'm not trying to bash her, just bemoan the ever-dwindling indie spirit of originality and writers daring to have an actual immersion in the worlds they long to depict as opposed to immersion in screenwriting workshops. It's cool to me if Tarantino bases films on the reality of other films, since that's part of the appeal, but he's not passing it off as 'real' kitchen sink drama... he gets the mythic power like no other, better even than the films he loves themselves.

Maybe I'm still mad at McDonald for all the phony quirkiness and self-awarded hipster cred in HIGHWAY 61. Here he longs to make a movie about a confused girl, but is undone by his fear of getting too close to her. So she's naked but behind a shower curtain, yet mentally as sealed up as if loaded to the gills on Xanax and texting from her cell phone...and alone... almost all the time alone - that easiest of ways to film an actress. The whole film seems to have been shot in a week, then edited for three years, ala something by George Lucas. What's up with these crazy-deficient Canadians? Being sane can be a terrible curse, if you decide to make a movie that's not.

Karina Longworth writes a good bit about the release/distribution problems hitting the FRAGMENTS here.

On the plus side, FRAGMENTS offers a good score from the Broken Social Scene, and Tracey reads Ed the Happy Clown comics!

For a real, genuinely bizarre film about a fucked up chick in Canada, can I steer you towards the under appreciated and flat-out weird tale of incest and topless boxing PUNCH? (that link is to a review I wrote in 2004).

Read another of my diatribes about Page, this one on HARD CANDY, here.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...